You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From what I can tell, the G (Cgroupv2) view and the E (GPU) views are mutually exclusive, as are the G and e views, such that (FWICT) there is not any aggregation for GPU utilization per cgroup (v2).
I understand that there are no control files (AFAIK) in cgroupsv2 for GPU, so atop would need to perform the calculations/aggregations, I think.
I think it could be useful, for instance: a multi-tenancy research cluster with many GPUs, to show which jobs are responsible for what GPU utilization on a cgroup level (assuming that a cgroup name is more meaningful to the admins than a PID for some cases).