Skip to content

Conversation

smokeyScraper
Copy link
Contributor

@smokeyScraper smokeyScraper commented Sep 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Replaced detailed technical README content with a concise, branding-focused presentation.
    • Added logo placeholders, social badges, contributor graphics, and community links.
    • Condensed architecture, workflows, diagrams, and setup instructions into high-level feature and tech-stack summaries with external links for details.
    • Reorganized content for clearer navigation and a more approachable, marketing-oriented tone.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The README was rewritten from a detailed technical reference into a concise, branding-focused document: diagrams, architecture details, and setup instructions were removed or collapsed, replaced with a logo, high-level feature summaries, tech stack bullets, community links, and placeholder visuals. (49 words)

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Docs branding-focused rewrite
README.md
Replaced detailed architecture, workflows, diagrams, screenshots, and in-depth setup/deployment instructions with a condensed, branding-oriented README featuring a prominent logo, badges, high-level features, tech stack bullets, community/repo links, Notion references, and placeholder visuals; reorganized sections and simplified command/setup guidance.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A rabbit nibble on the README page,
Rewrites and badges center stage.
Diagrams snooze, the logo takes flight,
Links and cheer in morning light.
Hop—new docs ready, sleek and bright! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “[update]: simplify readme” directly reflects the primary change of condensing and refocusing the README, is concise, and clearly communicates the main intent of the pull request.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

16-16: Fix heading hierarchy per markdownlint

Line 16 jumps from the H1 straight to an H3, triggering markdownlint MD001. Please bump this to ## (or insert an intervening H2) so heading levels increment sequentially. As per coding guidelines

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2cbddf3 and 0b38a11.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#87
File: tests/test_supabase.py:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-06-28T23:15:13.374Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to defer test updates and fixes (like missing imports after module reorganization) to separate PRs rather than expanding the scope of module update/chore PRs to include comprehensive test refactoring.
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#85
File: tests/test_supabase.py:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-06-28T14:45:55.244Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to defer comprehensive test refactoring to separate PRs/efforts when doing major backend restructuring, rather than expanding the scope of the current refactoring PR to include test updates.
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#90
File: backend/app/agents/devrel/nodes/react_supervisor.py:97-101
Timestamp: 2025-07-05T04:33:39.840Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to defer code deduplication refactoring (like extracting duplicate functions to shared utilities) until there are more common functionalities present among tools/workflow. With only two files using the same function, they consider it not a problem currently and prefer to "align later in a more better way" once more patterns emerge.
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#110
File: backend/app/agents/devrel/github/tools/contributor_recommendation.py:49-49
Timestamp: 2025-07-25T23:11:27.301Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to keep debug print statements (like print(response)) during the development phase for easier troubleshooting, with plans to remove them when moving to production rather than immediately cleaning them up.
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

16-16: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

16-16: Fix the heading level jump.

Heading levels should increment one step at a time—markdownlint (MD001) is flagging this ### directly after an #. Bump it to ## (or insert an intermediate heading) to clear the warning.

-### For in-depth documentation and internal workflow please refer [Notion](https://www.notion.so/Devr-AI-Design-and-Workflow-documenting-200881d7bed680bca517e9e53e1f7c3b)
+## For in-depth documentation and internal workflow please refer [Notion](https://www.notion.so/Devr-AI-Design-and-Workflow-documenting-200881d7bed680bca517e9e53e1f7c3b)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b38a11 and e66e3d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#87
File: tests/test_supabase.py:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-06-28T23:15:13.374Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to defer test updates and fixes (like missing imports after module reorganization) to separate PRs rather than expanding the scope of module update/chore PRs to include comprehensive test refactoring.
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#85
File: tests/test_supabase.py:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-06-28T14:45:55.244Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to defer comprehensive test refactoring to separate PRs/efforts when doing major backend restructuring, rather than expanding the scope of the current refactoring PR to include test updates.
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#90
File: backend/app/agents/devrel/nodes/react_supervisor.py:97-101
Timestamp: 2025-07-05T04:33:39.840Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to defer code deduplication refactoring (like extracting duplicate functions to shared utilities) until there are more common functionalities present among tools/workflow. With only two files using the same function, they consider it not a problem currently and prefer to "align later in a more better way" once more patterns emerge.
Learnt from: smokeyScraper
PR: AOSSIE-Org/Devr.AI#110
File: backend/app/agents/devrel/github/tools/contributor_recommendation.py:49-49
Timestamp: 2025-07-25T23:11:27.301Z
Learning: In the Devr.AI project, smokeyScraper prefers to keep debug print statements (like print(response)) during the development phase for easier troubleshooting, with plans to remove them when moving to production rather than immediately cleaning them up.
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

16-16: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3

(MD001, heading-increment)

Comment on lines +1 to +4
<div align="center">
<span>
<img src="[TO BE FILLED - DevR.AI LOGO]" alt="Devr.AI logo" width="150" height="auto" />
</span>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Replace the hero logo placeholder.

Shipping a README with <img src="[TO BE FILLED - DevR.AI LOGO]" …> renders a broken image. Either wire this up to the real asset or drop the tag until the logo is ready so the top of the README doesn’t show a broken graphic.

- <img src="[TO BE FILLED - DevR.AI LOGO]" alt="Devr.AI logo" width="150" height="auto" />
+ <!-- TODO: add the final logo asset once available -->
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<div align="center">
<span>
<img src="[TO BE FILLED - DevR.AI LOGO]" alt="Devr.AI logo" width="150" height="auto" />
</span>
<div align="center">
<span>
<!-- TODO: add the final logo asset once available -->
</span>
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 1 to 4, the hero <img> uses a placeholder src ("[TO BE
FILLED - DevR.AI LOGO]") which renders as a broken image; either replace the src
with the correct logo asset path/URL (relative path in repo or CDN link) and
update alt/size attributes as needed, or remove the entire <img> tag (or wrap it
in a conditional comment) so the README shows no broken graphic until the real
logo is available.

@chandansgowda chandansgowda added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 28, 2025
@chandansgowda chandansgowda merged commit e76f1bf into AOSSIE-Org:main Sep 28, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants