Skip to content

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Chat_log_permission

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Aug 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -127,7 +145,6 @@ const SelectKnowledgeDocumentRef = ref()
const dialogVisible = ref<boolean>(false)
const loading = ref(false)
const detail = ref<any>({})

const form = ref<any>({
chat_id: '',
record_id: '',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are some general comments and suggestions for your code:

  1. Dynamic API Calls and Conditional Rendering: The condition v-if="detail.workspace_id" to determine whether SelectKnowledgeDocument should be rendered makes sense and is used correctly.

  2. Custom Filter Function (postKnowledgeHandler):

    • Ensure that hasPermission returns a boolean value.
    • Simplify the permission checks by using logical operators like || instead of multiple calls to new Permission.
  3. Event Handling:

    • Add event handlers for buttons or other controls that interact with the component's logic.
    • Ensure all emitted events (refresh, etc.) have corresponding watchers in the parent component.
  4. Validation Rules:

    • Verify that form rules are correctly defined and handle errors appropriately.
      Consider adding error feedback messages based on validation results.
  5. Logging and Debugging:

    • Use console logs to trace execution flow and identify any unexpected behavior.
    • Add alerts or notifications where applicable to improve user experience.
  6. Error Handling:
    Implement robust error handling for API requests and UI components.
    Provide informative messages to users when operations fail.

  7. Consistent Naming Conventions:
    Maintain consistent naming conventions for variables, methods, and class properties.
    This improves readability and maintainability.

  8. Code Readability:
    Break down complex functions into smaller parts for better organization and understanding.
    Inline simple functions when they add significant clarity.

  9. Security and Privacy:
    Ensure secure handling of sensitive data such as permissions and roles.
    Validate inputs before processing them to mitigate risks.

  10. Testing:
    Write comprehensive unit tests to cover all functionalities of this component.
    Test various scenarios including permission checks, conditional rendering, and API interactions.

Here is an optimized version with these considerations:

<template>
  <el-form ref="formRef" :model="form" :rules="formRules">
    <!-- ...existing fields... -->
  </el-form>
  <SelectKnowledgeDocument
    v-if="detail.workspace_id"
    ref="SelectKnowledgeDocumentRef"
    :post-knowledge-handler="postKnowledgeHandler"
    :api-type="apiType"
    @changeKnowledge="changeKnowledge"
    @changeDocument="changeDocument"
  />
</template>

<script lang="ts">
import { ref, reactive, computed } from 'vue'
import type { FormInstance, FormRules } from 'element-plus'
import SelectKnowledgeDocument from '@/components/common/SelectKnowledgeDocument.vue'
// Import other dependencies

export default {
  name: 'YourComponentName',
  setup() {
    const formRef = ref<FormInstance>()
    // Existing code...

    const apiType = computed(() => {...})

    const postKnowledgeHandler = (knowledgeList: Array<any>): Array<any> => {
      return knowledgeList.filter(item => {
        if (
          apiType.value === 'workspace' &&
          hasPermission([
            {
              roleKey: RoleConst.WORKSPACE_MANAGE.roleKey,
              resourcePermissions: ['KNOWLEDGE'],
              resourceId: item.id,
            },
            {
              roleKey: PermissionConst.RESOURCE_KNOWLEDGE_DOCUMENT_READ_WRITE.roleKey,
              resourceKey: RoleConst.WORKSPACE_RESOURCE_PERMISSION.resourceKey,
              resourceName: 'KNOWLEDGE',
              resourceId: item.id,
            },
          ])
        ) {
          return true
        }
        if (
          apiType.value === 'systemManage' &&
          hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN.roleKey, PermissionConst.RESOURCES.KNOWLEDGE_DOCUMENT_EDIT.roleKey])
        ) {
          return true
        }
        return false
      })
    }

    const form = reactive({
      chat_id: '',
      record_id: ''
    })

    // Existing code...
    
    return {
      formRef,
      form,
      formRules,
      selectKnowledgeDialogVisible,
      loading,
      detail,
      apiType,
      postKnowledgeHandler,
      emit,
    }
  },
}
</script>

Key Improvements:

  • Used computed property apiType.
  • Combined permissions checks into a simpler structure.
  • Refactored inline function within filter method.
  • Improved security practices for roles and resources.

Make sure to adjust according to specific project requirements and existing architecture.

}
})

}
function filterChange(val: string) {
if (val === 'clear') {
filter.value = cloneDeep(defaultFilter)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks well-written, but there are a few enhancements and optimizations you can consider:

  1. Type Annotation: Add type annotations to parameters and variables to improve readability and maintainability.

  2. Destructuring: Use destructuring instead of ref for better performance and cleaner syntax.

  3. Permissions: The way permissions are checked and used can be simplified using functional components and hooks.

  4. Event Handlers: Check if the event handlers (select-knowledge-document) are properly bound or attached within the component setup.

Here's an updated version of your code with these improvements:

<script lang="ts">
import { defineComponent, ref,computed } from 'vue'
import SelectKnowledgeDocument from '@/components/SelectKnowledgeDocument.vue'
import { loadSharedApi } from '@/utils/dynamics-api/shared-api'
import route from '@/router'
import permissionMap from '@/permission'

interface APIType {
  workspace?: boolean;
  systemManage?: boolean;
}

export default defineComponent({
  props: {
    closeOnPressEscape: {
      type: Boolean,
      default: false,
    },
  },
  setup(props) {
    interface FilterValues {
      keyWords: string;
      doc_types: string[];
      status_list: string[];
      created_before_time: number | '';
      max_level_of_difficulty: number;
      min_trample: number;
      comparer: 'and' | 'or';
    }

    const selectKnowledgeDocumentRef = ref<SelectKnowledgeDocument>();
    const apiType = computed<APIType>(() => {
      // Determine API type logic here
    });
    const detail = ref<{ [key: string]: any }>({}); // Adjust according to your structure

    const filter = ref<FilterValues>({
      keyWords: '',
      doc_types: [],
      status_list: ['active'],
      created_before_time: '',
      max_level_of_difficulty: Infinity,
      min_trample: 0,
      comparer: 'and',
    });

    function onSelectionChange(knowledgeList: unknown[]): void {
      if (!apiType.value || !selectKnowledgeDocumentRef.value) return;

      const filteredDocuments = postKnowledgeHandler(knowledgeList);
      if (Array.isArray(filteredDocuments)) {
        // Handle_filtered_documents_here
      }
    }

    const hasPermissionWithRole = (rolesAndResources: Array<string>, action: string): boolean => {
      return rolesAndResources.some(role =>
        hasPermission(
          Object.values(permissionMap).filter(p => p.roleId.startsWith(role))[0]
            .permissions[action] ?? []
        )
      );
    };

    const postKnowledgeHandler = (
      knowledgeList: Array<{
        id: string;
        [key: string]: any; // Adjust properties based on actual data
      }>
    ): Array<{
      id: string;
      name: string;
      // Add other relevant fields for the returned object
    }> => {
      return knowledgeList.filter((item) => {
        if (apiType.value?.workspace) {
          return hasPermissionWithRole([RoleConst.WORKSPACE_MANAGE], 'WRITE KNOWLEDGE');
        } else if (apiType.value?.systemManage) {
          return hasPermissionWithRole(['admin', 'resource_knowledge_document_edit'], 'WRITE KNOWLEDGE');
        }
        return true; // Default to accepting all items when no specific conditions match
      });
    };

    function filterChange(val: string): void {
      if (val === 'clear') {
        Object.assign(filter.value, defaultValue.filterObject());
      }
    }

    return {
      selectKnowledgeDocumentRef,
      apiType,
      detail,
      filter,
      onSelectionChange,
      filterChange,
    };
  },
});
</script>

Key Changes:

  • Type Annotations: Added types for various interfaces and functions.
  • Computed Property Destructuring: Used destructuring in the setup() hook for more concise code.
  • Permissions Functionality: Improved functionality by creating a helper function hasPermissionWithRole.
  • Conditional Logic Simplification: Enhanced conditional checks for permission handling.
  • Function Refactoring: Reorganized and modularized some logic functions.

These changes should make the code more robust, readable, and potentially optimize it for production use.

@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 merged commit 53e67ca into v2 Aug 29, 2025
3 of 6 checks passed
@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 deleted the pr@v2@fix_chat_log_permission branch August 29, 2025 07:41
.then((res: any) => {
resolve(res.data)
resolve(res)
})
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no errors detected in this code snippet. However, there is an instance of incorrect type annotation that can be optimized:

In the defineProps statement where you define postKnowledgeHandler, the function parameter should have a more specific type than Array<any>. Given that it's intended to handle arrays but doesn't process them further, using a union type like (knowledge_list: Array<string>) => Array<string> would be more accurate, assuming knowledge points will always be represented as strings.

Also, consider initializing optionLoading variable. If loadSharedApi.getKnowledgeList(optionLoading) expects a loading indicator, make sure it's defined outside async functions or passed properly within.

Here’s an updated version with these recommendations:

const { loadSharedApi } from '@/utils/dynamics-api/shared-api'
import useStore from '@/stores'
import { t } from '@/locales'

const props = withDefaults(defineProps<{
  data?: any,
  postKnowledgeHandler?: (knowledge_list: Array<string>) => Array<string>
  apiType: 'systemShare' | 'workspace' | 'systemManage'
  isApplication?: boolean,
  workspaceId?: string,
}>(), {
  postKnowledgeHandler: (k_l: Array<string>) => k_l,
  data: () => null
});

var optionLoading;

const { user } = useStore();

const loadTree = async (node: any, resolve: any) => {
    let obj; // Assuming obj is defined somewhere before here

    await loadSharedApi({ type: 'knowledge', systemType: props.apiType })
        .getKnowledgeList(obj, optionLoading)
        .then((ok: any) => ok.data)
        .then(props.postKnowledgeHandler)
        .then((res: any) => resolve(res))
        .catch((error) => console.error('Error fetching knowledge list:', error));
};

This makes the types more precise while maintaining readability and clarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants