-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 663
refactor: Update setData method (address #563) #565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
c3874ae to
5b24600
Compare
|
Ah I'm so sorry, I wasn't clear in my comment! I think we should keep the signature the same as it is currently. Instead, we could update the function to do a deep merge: const Cmp = {
data: () => ({
anObject: {
propA: 'a',
propB: 'b'
}
})
}
const wrapper = mount(Cmp)
wrapper.setData({
anObject: {
propB: 'c'
}
})
wrapper.vm.anObject.propA // 'a'
wrapper.vm.anObject.propB // 'c' |
|
Ah gotcha, will update accordingly! |
59a26a0 to
37924d7
Compare
packages/test-utils/src/wrapper.js
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Object.keys(data).forEach((key) => { | ||
| // $FlowIgnore : Problem with possibly null this.vm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that this line should be removed.
packages/test-utils/src/wrapper.js
Outdated
| if (typeof data[key] === typeof {} && data[key] !== null) { | ||
| Object.keys(data[key]).forEach((key2) => { | ||
| var newObj = Object.assign({}, data[key], data[key][key2]) | ||
| this.vm.$set(this.vm, [key], newObj) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is necessary to add the following line before this line.
// $FlowIgnore : Problem with possibly null this.vm
| this.vm.$set(this.vm, [key], newObj) | ||
| }) | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.vm.$set(this.vm, [key], data[key]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is necessary to add the following line before this line.
// $FlowIgnore : Problem with possibly null this.vm
packages/test-utils/src/wrapper.js
Outdated
| this.vm.$set(this.vm, [key], data[key]) | ||
| if (typeof data[key] === typeof {} && data[key] !== null) { | ||
| Object.keys(data[key]).forEach((key2) => { | ||
| var newObj = Object.assign({}, data[key], data[key][key2]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think spread syntax is frequently used in this repository.
I think it is better to change var to const.
const newObj = { ...data[key], ...data[key][key2]}
packages/test-utils/src/wrapper.js
Outdated
| Object.keys(data).forEach((key) => { | ||
| // $FlowIgnore : Problem with possibly null this.vm | ||
| this.vm.$set(this.vm, [key], data[key]) | ||
| if (typeof data[key] === typeof {} && data[key] !== null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you tell me why are you using typeof data[key] === typeof {}, not typeof data[key] === 'object' ?
I think typeof data[key] === 'object' is better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The null check was necessary because null is of type object. If you're updating an object with {message: null}, it will pass this conditional, which it technically shouldn't since it's not a nested object.
|
It is necessary to execute |
packages/test-utils/src/wrapper.js
Outdated
| if (typeof data[key] === 'object' && data[key] !== null) { | ||
| Object.keys(data[key]).forEach((key2) => { | ||
| var newObj = Object.assign({}, data[key], data[key][key2]) | ||
| const newObj = { ...data[key], ...data[key][key2]} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is necessary to add space.
const newObj = { ...data[key], ...data[key][key2] }|
It is necessary to execute |
test/specs/wrapper/setData.spec.js
Outdated
| wrapper.setData({ message: null }) | ||
| expect(wrapper.text()).to.equal('There is no message yet') | ||
| }) | ||
| it('should update a data object', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is better to add a blank line before this line.
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| expect(wrapper.vm.anObject.propA.prop1).to.equal('c') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you give propA another property, and add an assertion that the value is unchanged after calling setData.
test/specs/wrapper/setData.spec.js
Outdated
| expect(wrapper.text()).to.equal('There is no message yet') | ||
| }) | ||
| it('should update a data object', () => { | ||
| const Cmp = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The convention we follow in this repo is to name these TestComponent
|
Updated! ✨ |
eddyerburgh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work, thanks :)
This is a refactor of the setData method to allow for setting data values and objects. The current implementation of setData only allows for setting values and not objects.
Addresses #563