Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Converting this to an issue, as it'd be a nice feature to have: #174 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have a use-case where I want to write ~100-300k STAC records to a stac-geoparquet file. I have found that this process is very memory intensive, though, so I am wondering if there is some way to reduce the memory footprint of my write operation by avoiding loading the entire list of items into memory before handing them off to
rustac.write.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions