fix vector fmin/fmax non-fast/fast intrinsics NaN handling #49231
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit e0165af has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2018
fix vector fmin/fmax non-fast/fast intrinsics NaN handling This bugs shows up in release mode tests of `stdsimd`: rust-lang/stdarch#391 . The intrinsics are thoroughly tested there for roundoff errors, NaN, and overflow behavior. The problem was that the non-fast intrinsics where specifying `NoNaNs == true`, which meant that they don't support NaNs. This is incorrect, the non-fast intrinsics should handle NaNs properly. Also, the "fast" intrinsics where specifying `NoNaNs == false` which meant that they support NaNs and then fast-math, which probably disables this support. This was not intended either. I've added a comment specifying what the boolean flags do.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2018
fix vector fmin/fmax non-fast/fast intrinsics NaN handling This bugs shows up in release mode tests of `stdsimd`: rust-lang/stdarch#391 . The intrinsics are thoroughly tested there for roundoff errors, NaN, and overflow behavior. The problem was that the non-fast intrinsics where specifying `NoNaNs == true`, which meant that they don't support NaNs. This is incorrect, the non-fast intrinsics should handle NaNs properly. Also, the "fast" intrinsics where specifying `NoNaNs == false` which meant that they support NaNs and then fast-math, which probably disables this support. This was not intended either. I've added a comment specifying what the boolean flags do.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This bugs shows up in release mode tests of
stdsimd: rust-lang/stdarch#391 . The intrinsics are thoroughly tested there for roundoff errors, NaN, and overflow behavior.The problem was that the non-fast intrinsics where specifying
NoNaNs == true, which meant that they don't support NaNs. This is incorrect, the non-fast intrinsics should handle NaNs properly.Also, the "fast" intrinsics where specifying
NoNaNs == falsewhich meant that they support NaNs and then fast-math, which probably disables this support. This was not intended either.I've added a comment specifying what the boolean flags do.