Commit ce40742
authored
Rollup merge of #111072 - Urgau:check-cfg-new-syntax, r=petrochenkov
Add new simpler and more explicit syntax for check-cfg
<details>
<summary>
Old proposition (before the MCP)
</summary>
This PR adds a new simpler and more explicit syntax for check-cfg. It consist of two new form:
- `exhaustive(names, values)`
- `configure(name, "value1", "value2", ... "valueN")`
The preview forms `names(...)` and `values(...)` have implicit meaning that are not strait-forward. In particular `values(foo)`&`values(bar)` and `names(foo, bar)` are not equivalent which has created [some confusions](#98080).
Also the `names()` and `values()` form are not clear either and again created some confusions where peoples believed that `values()`&`values(foo)` could be reduced to just `values(foo)`.
To fix that the two new forms are made to be explicit and simpler. See the table of correspondence:
- `names()` -> `exhaustive(names)`
- `values()` -> `exhaustive(values)`
- `names(foo)` -> `exhaustive(names)`&`configure(foo)`
- `values(foo)` -> `configure(foo)`
- `values(feat, "foo", "bar")` -> `configure(feat, "foo", "bar")`
- `values(foo)`&`values(bar)` -> `configure(foo, bar)`
- `names()`&`values()`&`values(my_cfg)` -> `exhaustive(names, values)`&`configure(my_cfg)`
Another benefits of the new syntax is that it allow for further options (like conditional checking for --cfg, currently always on) without syntax change.
The two previous forms are deprecated and will be removed once cargo and beta rustc have the necessary support.
</details>
This PR is the first part of the implementation of [MCP636 - Simplify and improve explicitness of the check-cfg syntax](rust-lang/compiler-team#636).
## New `cfg` form
It introduces the new [`cfg` form](rust-lang/compiler-team#636) and deprecate the other two:
```
rustc --check-cfg 'cfg(name1, ..., nameN, values("value1", "value2", ... "valueN"))'
```
## Default built-in names and values
It also changes the default for the built-in names and values checking.
- Built-in values checking would always be activated as long as a `--check-cfg` argument is present
- Built-in names checking would always be activated as long as a `--check-cfg` argument is present **unless** if any `cfg(any())` arg is passed
~~**Note: depends on #111068 but is reviewable (last two commits)!**~~
Resolve rust-lang/compiler-team#636
r? `@petrochenkov`File tree
72 files changed
+1017
-216
lines changed- compiler/rustc_interface/src
- src/doc
- rustdoc/src
- unstable-book/src/compiler-flags
- tests
- rustdoc-ui
- check-cfg
- doctest
- ui/check-cfg
Some content is hidden
Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.
72 files changed
+1017
-216
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
125 | 125 | | |
126 | 126 | | |
127 | 127 | | |
128 | | - | |
| 128 | + | |
| 129 | + | |
| 130 | + | |
| 131 | + | |
| 132 | + | |
129 | 133 | | |
| 134 | + | |
130 | 135 | | |
131 | 136 | | |
132 | 137 | | |
| |||
142 | 147 | | |
143 | 148 | | |
144 | 149 | | |
145 | | - | |
146 | | - | |
147 | | - | |
148 | | - | |
149 | | - | |
150 | | - | |
| 150 | + | |
| 151 | + | |
151 | 152 | | |
152 | 153 | | |
153 | 154 | | |
154 | 155 | | |
155 | 156 | | |
156 | 157 | | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
| 161 | + | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
157 | 165 | | |
158 | 166 | | |
159 | 167 | | |
| |||
167 | 175 | | |
168 | 176 | | |
169 | 177 | | |
| 178 | + | |
| 179 | + | |
| 180 | + | |
| 181 | + | |
| 182 | + | |
| 183 | + | |
| 184 | + | |
170 | 185 | | |
171 | 186 | | |
172 | 187 | | |
| |||
216 | 231 | | |
217 | 232 | | |
218 | 233 | | |
| 234 | + | |
| 235 | + | |
| 236 | + | |
| 237 | + | |
| 238 | + | |
| 239 | + | |
| 240 | + | |
| 241 | + | |
| 242 | + | |
| 243 | + | |
| 244 | + | |
| 245 | + | |
| 246 | + | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
| 252 | + | |
| 253 | + | |
| 254 | + | |
| 255 | + | |
| 256 | + | |
| 257 | + | |
| 258 | + | |
| 259 | + | |
| 260 | + | |
| 261 | + | |
| 262 | + | |
| 263 | + | |
| 264 | + | |
| 265 | + | |
| 266 | + | |
| 267 | + | |
| 268 | + | |
| 269 | + | |
| 270 | + | |
| 271 | + | |
| 272 | + | |
| 273 | + | |
| 274 | + | |
| 275 | + | |
| 276 | + | |
| 277 | + | |
| 278 | + | |
| 279 | + | |
| 280 | + | |
| 281 | + | |
| 282 | + | |
| 283 | + | |
| 284 | + | |
| 285 | + | |
| 286 | + | |
| 287 | + | |
| 288 | + | |
| 289 | + | |
| 290 | + | |
| 291 | + | |
| 292 | + | |
| 293 | + | |
| 294 | + | |
| 295 | + | |
| 296 | + | |
| 297 | + | |
| 298 | + | |
| 299 | + | |
| 300 | + | |
| 301 | + | |
| 302 | + | |
| 303 | + | |
| 304 | + | |
| 305 | + | |
| 306 | + | |
| 307 | + | |
| 308 | + | |
| 309 | + | |
| 310 | + | |
| 311 | + | |
| 312 | + | |
| 313 | + | |
| 314 | + | |
| 315 | + | |
| 316 | + | |
| 317 | + | |
| 318 | + | |
| 319 | + | |
| 320 | + | |
| 321 | + | |
| 322 | + | |
| 323 | + | |
| 324 | + | |
| 325 | + | |
| 326 | + | |
| 327 | + | |
| 328 | + | |
| 329 | + | |
| 330 | + | |
| 331 | + | |
| 332 | + | |
| 333 | + | |
| 334 | + | |
| 335 | + | |
| 336 | + | |
| 337 | + | |
| 338 | + | |
| 339 | + | |
| 340 | + | |
| 341 | + | |
| 342 | + | |
| 343 | + | |
219 | 344 | | |
220 | 345 | | |
221 | 346 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
3 | 3 | | |
4 | 4 | | |
5 | 5 | | |
| 6 | + | |
6 | 7 | | |
7 | 8 | | |
8 | 9 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
628 | 628 | | |
629 | 629 | | |
630 | 630 | | |
631 | | - | |
| 631 | + | |
632 | 632 | | |
633 | 633 | | |
634 | | - | |
| 634 | + | |
635 | 635 | | |
636 | 636 | | |
637 | 637 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments