Replies: 1 comment
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
During the last meeting and today we discussed the migration from Matlab to Python and possible interfaces. One approach that deserves further study is to define a clean interface between data acquisition (similar or identical to current special-measure or qtlab) and the pulse-related control utilities. Allowing a variety of data acquisition and instrument control solutions to be compatible could be attractive. In any case, a well defined interface with as few interconnections as possible seems desirable.
As a start, we concluded that Simon would soon start exploring the used of the Matlab-Python interface to generate scan structs in Matlab from Python. This could provide a simple way to continue using our acquisition software together with the new framework.
The alternative is to migrate to QTlab. Here, first steps could be to implement a driver (e.g. for the averaging DLL) to see how well it suits our concept and perhaps a generic driver wrapper to simplify recycling.
In this context, I would like to bring this package to your attention: labcontrol-software.com. It seems to support similar features as special measure, but is likely better documented, implemented less minimalistically and may be easier to use. A downside is that it seems to be on the way to being commercialized. One may debate whether a GUI is good or bad, but it does support Python scripting.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions