Support for Jupyter Notebooks in code reviews #12959
Replies: 13 comments 9 replies
-
|
I echo this feature request. Currently I rely on this 3rd party service. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Same, as someone doing code reviews for university students (with github classroom) I can't give proper feedback on notebooks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
👋 We've just opened up a feature preview for diffing Jupyter Notebooks, please fill out this form for access and provide feedback in this discussion |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Not sure what the timeline is for this feature to be finished, but in the meantime you can use GitNotebooks. It's free for private repos. Just a little friendly competition 😛 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey @ruthappel, thank you for taking this up :) I was just wondering - what is the official timeline for going out of testing into production? We could really need it at work, but as we don't have access to feature previews, we can't make use of it atm. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
any news on this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
any update? where is this on the roadmap? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You can enable this in Feature preview, found by clicking your picture in the top right. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
While the Rich Jupyter Notebook Diffs feature is available in preview, there is still no way to comment on the diffs. Is there a timeline for that feature. Its a real limitation for data teams. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
GitHub should just acquire GitNotebooks and assimilate it into the product. We need to be able to elegantly preview notebooks and leave comments in reviews. It's 2025 now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
bump |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Any updates on when the feature will be out? We also want to suggest changes through comments directly on the code |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello 👋. Why is this feature request not prioritized 3 years in? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently in PRs, when viewing files with the
.ipynbextension, they are displayed only in the raw JSON representation, which makes it essentially useless for conducting code reviews. The line numbers don't align with the notebook, there's no syntax highlighting, all the metadata is viewable, etc.It would be amazing to have the files rendered in the familiar notebook format with cells.
Ideally, it would be nice to also have support for rendering interactive cell outputs (ie, not just static images), but at a minimum, adding comments to notebooks in the cell format should be supported.
Is this on your radar? If so, is there any kind of timeline for this?
I would assume this a huge pain point for many data science teams that would like to use GitHub for source control, but simply cannot because their go-to file format is unsupported in code reviews.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions