Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I think your overarching goal of "rotating trace files" in the way you're going to describe is going to be a janky and suboptimal experience. We don't support "steaming" traces in the UI so updating the contents of traces in the way you describe is not going to work.

For the specific problem of planning around a trace programmaticly after the trace is loaded: I think that's something which is not supported today but could probably be added. PRs for that welcome if you can suggest a good design for it. We would need to design some postMessage API so that you can specify what you want to happen. We would probably have it hook into our action system.

Replies: 3 comments 6 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@unphased
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@unphased
Comment options

@unphased
Comment options

@LalitMaganti
Comment options

Answer selected by LalitMaganti
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@unphased
Comment options

@LalitMaganti
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants