What are the explanations for the different results in scanning? #2163
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
would you able to share the complete also, I assume the diffs listed above come from: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
copy over the comment in #2079:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@moritzschmitz-oviva could you also try to run also you mentioned that the run failed in v2.1 but you also did present the scan result before for the question whether #2079 is a bug: I don't think so. The reason behind that PR is that if the transitive scanning fails we probably won't have any dependencies extracted and we can do nothing; but if we fallback to the offline extractor, at least some dependencies will be extracted so we can try our best to match the vulnerabilities. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@cuixq I set up a project here as simple as possible: https://github.com/moritzschmitz-oviva/osv-scanner-test. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The failure is due to package I have also filed a bug with deps.dev google/deps.dev#290 on this data quality issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I did two different scans.
This is the scan before:
This is the diff:
This is the scan after:
This seems unintuitive at least, what is happening?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions