You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking to fine tune google/gemma-3-12b-it with my dataset of around 10k examples. But in my dataset the outputs are quiet lengthy (some of them may reach 125k and average being around 60k tokens) so I thought I may take adventage of max_position_embedding= 131072 of this model. But I haven't seen anywhere in examples for fine tuning setting max_seq_length of trl.SFTTrainer as 131072.
Is it smth doable? Or does 131072 only applies for inference? How people should/are approach(ing) fine tuning for lengthy outputs in dataset?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Looking to fine tune google/gemma-3-12b-it with my dataset of around 10k examples. But in my dataset the outputs are quiet lengthy (some of them may reach 125k and average being around 60k tokens) so I thought I may take adventage of max_position_embedding= 131072 of this model. But I haven't seen anywhere in examples for fine tuning setting max_seq_length of trl.SFTTrainer as 131072.
Is it smth doable? Or does 131072 only applies for inference? How people should/are approach(ing) fine tuning for lengthy outputs in dataset?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions