Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@4mb1t10n Here is a writeup on how I got Spec Kit to use Claude Sub Agents - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/spec-driven-development-beyond-first-feature-api-design-krishnan--lbyec. This also helps with parallel execution. ![]() Is this on the lines of what you had in mind? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Has anyone managed to do this with the co-pilot? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The Current Strength: Spec Kit excels at methodical PRD planning and project structuring. The planning phase is solid.
The Gap: The /implement command currently operates as a single agent trying to handle all implementation tasks. This creates inefficiencies, especially for specialized work.
The Comparison: I've been using Taskmaster for a few months, and while it struggles with PRD planning (where Spec Kit shines), its implementation approach using specialized sub-agents is fantastic.
The Proposal: Transform /implement into an orchestrator that delegates to specialist sub-agents.
Here's how it would work:
The Key Benefit: We eliminate context pollution. Right now, we have to load database design patterns into the main agent's context even when it's working on frontend tasks. With specialists, database knowledge lives with the database agent, frontend patterns with the frontend agent, and so on.
Bottom Line: Combine Spec Kit's planning strength with Taskmaster's implementation approach. Best of both worlds.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions