Skip to content

Conversation

@lovelydinosaur
Copy link
Contributor

I'd assumed we had http2 support for sync Clients now, which is kind of true, in that the transport supports it now, but I'd forgotten that we didn't yet have an http2=[False|True] flag on the Client instance, since we've never needed one until now.

@florimondmanca florimondmanca added the http/2 Issues and PRs related to HTTP/2 label May 22, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@florimondmanca florimondmanca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

I see the HTTP/2 Support docs are already up to date, so assuming the API reference will be updated by mkautodoc it looks like we're all good there as well. :-)

@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur merged commit a4145ce into master May 22, 2020
@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur deleted the http2-for-sync branch May 22, 2020 10:52
@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur mentioned this pull request May 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

http/2 Issues and PRs related to HTTP/2

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants