Revert PR 1426 - PostGIS param stripping.

[tim-schilling]

The stripping logic is stripping general sql parameters and the test
written for it does not run. I'm not confident that the test actually
hits the code we expect it to run either.

Closes #1543
Reopens #423

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1547 (972aa14) into main (69506fb) will decrease coverage by 0.20%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1547      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.91%   85.71%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        1889     1883       -6     
  Branches      313      310       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         1623     1614       -9     
- Misses        187      190       +3     
  Partials       79       79              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
debug_toolbar/panels/sql/tracking.py	88.23% <ø> (-0.57%)	⬇️
debug_toolbar/panels/profiling.py	85.41% <0.00%> (-3.13%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 69506fb...972aa14. Read the comment docs.

[tim-schilling]

I kept the postgis testing so things are easier to manage in the future if we reattempt #423. Though I was close to removing it all.

[matthiask]

Thanks! For the record, I definitely agree with this decision. I don't know what I was thinking when merging the PR, probably not too much :/

[tim-schilling]

Eh, it happens. I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I'm not sure there's a great answer to preventing this in the future other than more involvement on our parts when assessing PRs.