Raise PropertyMovedToConfigDeprecation instead of CustomTopLevelKeyDeprecation when additional attribute is a valid config

[MichelleArk]

Problem

Currently the following model definition:

models:
  - name: models_trivial
    description: "This is a test model"
    access: public

raises a CustomTopLevelKeyDeprecation - which is misleading because access is not 'custom' to the user - it's an accepted config part of the dbt framework. dbt-autofix reports fixing this issue as fixing PropertyMovedToConfigDeprecation as well.

Solution

Check if a field is a valid config prior and raising the more appropriate PropertyMovedToConfigDeprecation if it is.
Finding what valid fields are based on the schema was a little challenging to get right since we have many levels of nesting and fields with config! (e.g. sources, tables, columns)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me.
• I have run this code in development, and it appears to resolve the stated issue.
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required or relevant for this PR.
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g., macros, CLI, logs, JSON artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc.) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX.
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions.

[github-actions]

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.95652% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.87%. Comparing base (b1705fb) to head (82cb8ca).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (8.69%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11879      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.91%   91.87%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         199      199              
  Lines       24347    24368      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits        22379    22387       +8     
- Misses       1968     1981      +13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	88.73% <86.95%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
unit	65.26% <8.69%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
Unit Tests	65.26% <8.69%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
Integration Tests	88.73% <86.95%> (-0.13%)	⬇️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.