Skip to content

Commit f7c877e

Browse files
stefano-garzarellaPaolo Abeni
authored andcommitted
vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()
Syzbot reported a potential lock inversion deadlock between vsock_register_mutex and sk_lock-AF_VSOCK when vsock_linger() is called. The issue was introduced by commit 687aa0c ("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") which added vsock_register_mutex locking in vsock_assign_transport() around the transport->release() call, that can call vsock_linger(). vsock_assign_transport() can be called with sk_lock held. vsock_linger() calls sk_wait_event() that temporarily releases and re-acquires sk_lock. During this window, if another thread hold vsock_register_mutex while trying to acquire sk_lock, a circular dependency is created. Fix this by releasing vsock_register_mutex before calling transport->release() and vsock_deassign_transport(). This is safe because we don't need to hold vsock_register_mutex while releasing the old transport, and we ensure the new transport won't disappear by obtaining a module reference first via try_module_get(). Reported-by: [email protected] Tested-by: [email protected] Fixes: 687aa0c ("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
1 parent df890ce commit f7c877e

File tree

1 file changed

+19
-19
lines changed

1 file changed

+19
-19
lines changed

net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c

Lines changed: 19 additions & 19 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -487,12 +487,26 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
487487
goto err;
488488
}
489489

490-
if (vsk->transport) {
491-
if (vsk->transport == new_transport) {
492-
ret = 0;
493-
goto err;
494-
}
490+
if (vsk->transport && vsk->transport == new_transport) {
491+
ret = 0;
492+
goto err;
493+
}
495494

495+
/* We increase the module refcnt to prevent the transport unloading
496+
* while there are open sockets assigned to it.
497+
*/
498+
if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module)) {
499+
ret = -ENODEV;
500+
goto err;
501+
}
502+
503+
/* It's safe to release the mutex after a successful try_module_get().
504+
* Whichever transport `new_transport` points at, it won't go away until
505+
* the last module_put() below or in vsock_deassign_transport().
506+
*/
507+
mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
508+
509+
if (vsk->transport) {
496510
/* transport->release() must be called with sock lock acquired.
497511
* This path can only be taken during vsock_connect(), where we
498512
* have already held the sock lock. In the other cases, this
@@ -512,20 +526,6 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
512526
vsk->peer_shutdown = 0;
513527
}
514528

515-
/* We increase the module refcnt to prevent the transport unloading
516-
* while there are open sockets assigned to it.
517-
*/
518-
if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module)) {
519-
ret = -ENODEV;
520-
goto err;
521-
}
522-
523-
/* It's safe to release the mutex after a successful try_module_get().
524-
* Whichever transport `new_transport` points at, it won't go away until
525-
* the last module_put() below or in vsock_deassign_transport().
526-
*/
527-
mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
528-
529529
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
530530
if (!new_transport->seqpacket_allow ||
531531
!new_transport->seqpacket_allow(remote_cid)) {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)