@@ -412,10 +412,10 @@ <h1>pcre2api man page</h1>
412412 < b > PCRE2_UCHAR8, PCRE2_UCHAR16, PCRE2_UCHAR32</ b >
413413 < b > PCRE2_SPTR8, PCRE2_SPTR16, PCRE2_SPTR32</ b >
414414</ pre >
415- The UCHAR types define unsigned code units of the appropriate widths. For
416- example, PCRE2_UCHAR16 is usually defined as `uint16_t'. The SPTR types are
417- constant pointers to the equivalent UCHAR types, that is, they are pointers to
418- vectors of unsigned code units.
415+ The UCHAR types define unsigned code units of the appropriate widths.
416+ For example, PCRE2_UCHAR16 is usually defined as `uint16_t'.
417+ The SPTR types are pointers to constants of the equivalent UCHAR types,
418+ that is, they are pointers to vectors of unsigned code units.
419419</ P >
420420< P >
421421Character strings are passed to a PCRE2 library as sequences of unsigned
@@ -2864,15 +2864,15 @@ <h1>pcre2api man page</h1>
28642864< P >
28652865The use of recursion in patterns can lead to infinite loops. In the
28662866interpretive matcher these would be eventually caught by the match or heap
2867- limits, but this could take a long time and/or use a lot of memory if the
2867+ limits, but this could take a long time and/or use a lot of memory if the
28682868limits are large. There is therefore a check at the start of each recursion.
2869- If the same group is still active from a previous call, and the current subject
2869+ If the same group is still active from a previous call, and the current subject
28702870pointer is the same as it was at the start of that group, and the furthest
28712871inspected character of the subject has not changed, an error is generated.
28722872</ P >
28732873< P >
28742874There are rare cases of matches that would complete, but nevertheless trigger
2875- this error. This option disables the check. It is provided mainly for testing
2875+ this error. This option disables the check. It is provided mainly for testing
28762876when comparing JIT and interpretive behaviour.
28772877< pre >
28782878 PCRE2_ENDANCHORED
0 commit comments